Social media for business is supposed to help promote brands and endear them to the public. But things don’t always go according to plan.

Bad jokes, silly scheduling, and even downright incompetence can leave companies scrambling to make quick apologies and save face.

While social media for business screw-ups can leave a company’s PR team working overtime, the good news for brands is we live in the age of the 24-hour news cycle. One embarrassing headline-grabbing mistake only lasts so long before it’s replaced by another business’s blunder.

The worst #socialmediamarketing mistakes of 2018 so far (and what you can learn from them)
Click To Tweet


Here are some of this year’s social media fails that deserve the biggest facepalms—and how you can avoid making the same mistakes.

1. New York Times – Millennials and snake people

While not exactly a social media fail per se, the New York Times became the source of both jokes and confusion when one of its editors forgot to turn off a satirical browser extension before editing an article.
When the newspaper published a digital-only piece about Donald Trump’s trade claims, readers quickly discovered it included a nonsensical quote from Time Magazine.

After social media followers began pointing out the error, the newspaper quickly issued a correction, stating an editor had copied and pasted the quote using the Millennials to Snake People browser extension. Apparently, the editor didn’t notice his mistake before publishing.

As well as replacing the word “millennials” with “snake people,” the extension also replaced some other words and phrases with random gibberish.

The original quote from Time Magazine read, “America’s trade deficit narrowed dramatically during the Great Recession.”

But when copied and pasted with the “Millennials to Snake People” add-on, it read, “America’s trade deficit narrowed dramatically during the Time of Shedding and Cold Rocks.”

Justin Banks, the offending editor, sheepishly apologized on Twitter:

I’m horrified to be the guilty editor here. But thankfully @YLindaQiu‘s excellent work stands so far above it.

Also, I have now deleted the excellent Millenial-Snake Person Chrome extension. https://t.co/rd4KH2469r pic.twitter.com/Mh057RMCp9

— Justin Bank (@bankonjustin) March 7, 2018

When Gizmodo asked Eric Bailey, the creator of “Millennials to Snake People,” if he had anything to say about his work making it into The New York Times, he replied: “Computers were a mistake.”

How to avoid this fail: Always proofread your content before sharing it on social media for business. It’s also good to have a second pair of eyes check over your posts for accidental errors.

2. Snapchat – Users troll support bot

When Snapchat users started experiencing issues with Snapstreaks in July, the company tweeted the issue was being fixed in an effort to reassure its followers.

We’re aware many Snapchatters are experiencing crashing on the app. We’re looking into it and working on a fix!

— Snapchat Support (@snapchatsupport) July 11, 2018

But what the company didn’t anticipate after setting up a bot to auto-reply to unhappy users was that they’d start gaming the system.

One Twitter user caught on quickly and decided to test Snapchat. It’s safe to say the company didn’t pass.

Test: my snap streaks disappeared. This is a test, if you tell me to go to your website I’m done.

— Robin Wetterhall (@RWetterhall) July 11, 2018

Thanks for reaching out! We’re happy to help. Please go to: https://t.co/pLsBLYE56r and select ‘My Snapstreaks disappeared’ 🔥

— Snapchat Support (@snapchatsupport) July 11, 2018

Another user, Scott, quickly figured out what was going on.

I think it’s a keyword bot. If you say something like streak or lost streak it should automatically pop up

— scott foster (@scott6518) July 11, 2018

And that’s when other users decided to join in the fun.

England have lost there world cup streak. Any way they could get it back?

— Jack Scott (@JackScott__) July 11, 2018

Like snapchat i really lost my streak snap ing pictures of your mom

— 59 (@zXBennyXz) July 11, 2018

I’m lost but there are people running around naked, should I streak?

— Stephen Bubb (@Theyoutub28) July 11, 2018

Lost blablablablabla streaks

— Seynox (@SeynoxToxic) July 11, 2018

so I lost my cat yesterday. he was the light of my life. I don’t understand why he just ran away. he always comes back but this time, he disappeared. I don’t know how long this streak of him being away will last.

— Rip x (@MikeyMakesMusic) July 11, 2018

Thanks for reaching out! We’re happy to help. Please go to: https://t.co/pLsBLYE56r and select ‘My Snapstreaks disappeared’ 🔥

— Snapchat Support (@snapchatsupport) July 11, 2018

How to avoid this fail: Automation is a great way to save time, and in this case, quickly tweet users a reassuring message and point them in the right direction. But users are smart and will quickly figure things out if they think you’re treating them like numbers. While Snapchat’s bot no doubt helped a lot of users who were having issues, the company could’ve owned this blooper by recycling it as a meme.

3. Snapchat – Tone deaf Rihanna ad

When Snapchat ran an ad asking users if they’d rather slap Rihanna or punch Chris Brown, the “Diamonds” singer told the app to go and delete itself—and the company subsequently lost $800 million from its share price.

In what the company described as an oversight, it approved and published an ad for a game called “Would You Rather” that asked users whether they would prefer to “slap Rihanna” or “punch Chris Brown.”

Is it just me, or is this ad that popped up on my Snapchat extremely tone deaf? Like what were they thinking with this? pic.twitter.com/7kP9RHcgNG

— Royce Mann (@TheRoyceMann) March 12, 2018

The distasteful ad callously references the 2009 incident when Brown violently assaulted Rihanna, his then-girlfriend, to which he later pleaded guilty.

Rihanna took to Instagram—Snapchat’s rival—with a lengthy statement on Instagram Stories that called out the platform for intentionally shaming victims of domestic violence.

Rihanna's response to Snapchat on Instagram
Snapchat’s response was that the ad was made by a third party and not the social platform itself.
A spokesperson for the platform told The New York Times the ad was removed immediately and the advertiser blocked.

“This advertisement is disgusting and never should have appeared on our service,” the spokesperson said. “We are so sorry we made the terrible mistake of allowing it through our review process. We are investigating how that happened so that we can make sure it never happens again.”

Rihanna’s comments sent the share price value of Snapchat parent company, Snap, down by nearly 4 percent—erasing nearly $800m from the company’s market value.

How to avoid this fail: As far as fails go, this one was costly for Snapchat. To avoid falling into the same trap, properly review any third party content that is displayed on your site and subsequently shared to your social media for business. Stay well-clear of referencing sensitive subjects and making light of serious circumstances.

4. Miele – International Women’s Day Misfire

How do you celebrate modern women on International Women’s Day? By reinforcing the 1950s housewife stereotype.
Miele International Women's day social media for business
The appliances manufacturer probably thought it was cute to share an image of four women excited over a washer and dryer, but completely missed the mark. Miele deleted the Facebook post a few hours later.

How to avoid this fail: Don’t rely on old-fashioned stereotypes for your marketing. Know your target audience. Understand what drives them and use this information to inform your social media for business campaigns.

5. US Air Force – Yanny/Laurel joke bombs

In the midst of the Yanny/Laurel craziness back in May when this audio clip split the world into those who heard “Yanny” and those who heard “Laurel,” brands took to social media to react to the infamous debate.

From Barnes and Noble and Coca-Cola to Warby Parker and its more subtle promotion of its Laurel model of glasses but calling it Yanny, brands were quick to join in the fun.

Then, in the midst of a bombing campaign in Afghanistan, the US Air Force crossed the line with a tweet stating Taliban forces would rather have heard “Yanny” or “Laurel” instead of the noise of an A10 dropping bombs.

«Les talibans auraient préféré entendre Yanny ou Laurel plutôt que le bruit de notre A-10»

Ce tweet de l’US Air Force qui annonce le bombardement d’une ville est d’une violence 😭 pic.twitter.com/bWxbGWegvG

— Florent Derue (@florentderue) May 17, 2018

The tweet was widely condemned for being insensitive and diminishing the potential loss of civilian lives in the Middle East due to the ongoing War on Terror. The original tweet was quickly deleted and the US Air Force issued this apology:

We apologize for the earlier tweet regarding the A-10. It was made in poor taste and we are addressing it internally. It has since been removed.

— U.S. Air Force (@usairforce) May 17, 2018

How to avoid this fail: Be careful about how you leverage popular memes on social media for business. For a sensitive topic like death, or in this case war, think twice about using humor. If you’re not sure whether a joke is going to be well-received, just don’t do it. Always make sure that any news stories you try to piggyback on make sense and align with your brand.

6. Burger King – Free Whoppers for World Cup babies

Burger King’s Russian division came up with a rather crude and sexist promotion for VK—a Russian social network—after the country’s 5-0 opening game win against Saudi Arabia.

The burger chain offered women a lifetime supply of Whoppers and 3 million Russian roubles if they conceived a child with a World Cup soccer player.

Burger King promises $50,000 and lifetime whopper supply for Russian women able to get pregnant from any football celebrity (to transfer good genes to Russia) pic.twitter.com/su8lyfkt6N

— English Russia (@EnglishRussia1) June 19, 2018

In English, the ad reads:

“Burger King, as part of the social responsibility programme has announced a reward for women who get pregnant from the world recognized soccer celebrities. Each will receive 3million rubles and a lifetime supply of Whoppers. Women who succeed in genetic progeny will be responsible for the future success of Russian football team for generations to come. Let’s do it! We believe in you!”

It’s no surprise there was an immediate backlash to the promotion, including from social media and news outlets, and the campaign was removed.

Burger King apologized for the ad, in a statement saying:

“We are sorry about the clearly offensive promotion that the team in Russia launched online. As soon as it was brought to our attention, we had it removed. It certainly does not reflect our brand or our values and we are taking steps to ensure this type of activity does not happen again.”

How to avoid this fail: It’s obvious advice, but avoid social media for business campaigns that are sexist, demeaning, and crude, no matter who your target audience is.

7. Starbucks – Blonde espresso

Starbucks debuted its new “blonde” espresso in January, featuring a brightly colored campaign with somewhat confusing messaging.

Where Starbucks ads in the past have usually been fined tuned into the current political climate—even openly declared the company’s political leanings—the blonde campaign took a very different route.
For a start, the landing page features this confusing wording:
Starbucks blonde social media for business
Uhh… what?

I’ve read this so many times and it still doesn’t make any sense to me.

So… Starbucks is saying that they’ve been telling people for 43 years that espresso has to be intense, but then they decided it doesn’t…? It’s a weak piece of copywriting for a social media for business campaign if you ask me.

What’s more, the campaign’s tagline is “Blonde breaks rules.”

It seems to be a nod to the old-fashioned expression, “Blondes have more fun,” a phrase attributed to a series of Clairol commercials from the 1960s. The ads feature young women who find their lives become better when they dye their hair blonde and enjoy fun parties, marriage proposals, and even improved tennis skills.

Yes, the ad is kind of flirty but it’s also regressive and it doesn’t really make any sense for the brand. Does Starbucks simply want to give people the excuse to ask baristas for a tall blonde?
I’m not the only one who thinks this campaign is a bit off:

This morning at Starbucks I asked for a Tall Skinny Blonde and my barista said, “That’s not a real drink, but I see what you did there.”

— Ellen DeGeneres (@TheEllenShow) January 12, 2015

at Starbucks: I’d like a tall blonde flat white

at the Strip club: I’d like a split shot cappucci- *getting thrown out* ..nnNOOO

— wizard statue (@stoned_wizards) July 3, 2018

When an old man gets that impish look on his face and asks for a “tall blonde” at #Starbuckspic.twitter.com/S8SF42rJYF

— lillionaire (@lillionaire1) May 16, 2018

How to avoid this fail: Whether you agree with me on this one or not, it’s important that your own social media for business campaigns send a clear and effective message to your target audience. Run your campaign past others outside your business before sharing on social so you can make sure it doesn’t come off like an inside joke or weird gibberish.

8. Kaiwei Ni – The stray hair

Here’s an obscure one I’m slipping in even though it’s technically from December 2017. But I couldn’t resist because it takes clickbait to a whole new level, introducing the world to swipebait.

Chinese sneaker manufacturer Kaiewei Ni published a Black Friday ad to Instagram Stories with a stray hair in the center. Whoever made the ad designed it to look as if there was a stray hair on the phone screen of the person viewing it.

There is a fake hair on this ad to get you to swipe up.

Someone needs to stop these “growth hackers.” pic.twitter.com/FpqMdMOP2m

— Blake Robbins (@blakeir) December 9, 2017

What was clever, but also incredibly sneaky, about this ad was its goal—to trick users into swiping up on the ad so the user would be redirected to Kaiewei Ni’s website.

Not surprisingly, Instagram removed the ad for violating its policies and disabled the account from advertising in the future.

How to avoid this fail: People don’t like being treated like fools and engaging in tactics like this will only alienate potential customers. When you try to game a social platform, it’s only a matter of matter of time before you’re caught out and your social media for business account is suspended. If you really want to know how to advertise properly on Instagram, check out How to Advertise on Instagram: A Step-by-Step Guide.

How to avoid social media for business mistakes of your own

While the thought of making an embarrassing blunder on social media might be horrifying, knowing why mistakes happen is the first step toward avoiding them.

Having the right social media management tools in place, knowing how to use them, and establishing a meticulous approach to crafting campaigns and reviewing them, as well as having a solid marketing strategy, will ensure your brand’s communications are always on message.

Always review your #socialmedia campaigns meticulously to avoid social media fails
Click To Tweet



The post The Worst Social Media for Business Mistakes of 2018 So Far (and What You Can Learn from Them) appeared first on Revive Social.

Categories: Revive Social

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *